<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: The Bomb Spreads</title>
	<atom:link href="http://pathsoflight.us/musing/?feed=rss2&#038;p=204" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://pathsoflight.us/musing/?p=204</link>
	<description>A Friend looks at (mostly) the environment: "Let all nations hear the sound by word or writing. Spare not place, spare not tongue, nor pen...This is the word of the Lord God to you all, a charge to you all in the presence of the living God; be patterns, be examples in all countries, places, islands, nations, wherever you come; that your life and conduct may preach among all sorts of people, and to them. Then you will come to walk cheerfully over the world, answering that of God in every one...Spare no deceit." George Fox</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 03 Sep 2010 18:58:57 -0400</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.0.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: catharine Lucas</title>
		<link>http://pathsoflight.us/musing/?p=204&#038;cpage=1#comment-7647</link>
		<dc:creator>catharine Lucas</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 29 Nov 2006 21:05:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://pathsoflight.us/musing/?p=204#comment-7647</guid>
		<description>In working through your extensive data on the history of nuclear weapons proliferation, I find it hard to reach a conclusion about &quot;what now&quot;? 

The one thing that occurs to me is that the US already has both nuclear weapons AND nuclear power plants, so the threat of how nuclear energy reactors or nuclear research might be used in other countries is not a real reason to delay developing our own capacity for producing more nuclear energy to meet our growing energy needs.  Elsewhere you have shown what a superior source of energy this fuel can be, in many ways.  If we can&#039;t put the genie back in the bottle, we can at least put it to work on slowing global warming.  Are there reasons why additional nuclear plants in the US would increase the danger of proliferation in other countries, over what danger already exists?  Why not spend time and energy trying to develop better international controls/policies etc. rather than opposing our own peaceful use of nuclear energy, which could help reduce the causes of future wars by helping stabalize climate?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>In working through your extensive data on the history of nuclear weapons proliferation, I find it hard to reach a conclusion about &#8220;what now&#8221;? </p>
<p>The one thing that occurs to me is that the US already has both nuclear weapons AND nuclear power plants, so the threat of how nuclear energy reactors or nuclear research might be used in other countries is not a real reason to delay developing our own capacity for producing more nuclear energy to meet our growing energy needs.  Elsewhere you have shown what a superior source of energy this fuel can be, in many ways.  If we can&#8217;t put the genie back in the bottle, we can at least put it to work on slowing global warming.  Are there reasons why additional nuclear plants in the US would increase the danger of proliferation in other countries, over what danger already exists?  Why not spend time and energy trying to develop better international controls/policies etc. rather than opposing our own peaceful use of nuclear energy, which could help reduce the causes of future wars by helping stabalize climate?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: KO Lord</title>
		<link>http://pathsoflight.us/musing/?p=204&#038;cpage=1#comment-6871</link>
		<dc:creator>KO Lord</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 14 Nov 2006 11:27:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://pathsoflight.us/musing/?p=204#comment-6871</guid>
		<description>This blog has come a long way. I am very impressed with the formatting and thoroughness of your presentation. Unfortunately, I am not in the position to comment directly on the technical aspects you discuss, except to say that the possibility of nuclear proliferation from the technology used to develop civilian nuclear power plants is --and will no doubt remain-- profoundly disturbing.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>This blog has come a long way. I am very impressed with the formatting and thoroughness of your presentation. Unfortunately, I am not in the position to comment directly on the technical aspects you discuss, except to say that the possibility of nuclear proliferation from the technology used to develop civilian nuclear power plants is &#8211;and will no doubt remain&#8211; profoundly disturbing.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
